This was a bad one, I was chatting with a buddy
Submitted by Shawn
Share More
Tags
Rachel Marquez:
July 1, 2012 at 9:27 pm
Wish I could get sheep to fix my problems!
Kim Sherman:
July 1, 2012 at 10:34 pm
That's what I'm talking about !!!!!!
Brent Biever:
July 2, 2012 at 5:32 am
Can you ask the sheep to stop messing with your format?
#not broke, don't fix.
Billy Bob:
July 2, 2012 at 6:49 am
fuck you and your new formatt fuck it right in the ear never again shall I check this page till someone tells me it has changed. stick THAT on your fuckin sticky note mr editor. fuck you
Gregory Grove:
July 2, 2012 at 10:26 am
Oh go on... say what you REALLY think.
Anders Stoor:
July 2, 2012 at 9:29 am
You should go back two at least 10 autocorrects/page. The new design is too heavy to visit.
Dean Symons:
July 2, 2012 at 10:09 am
Wow, what a horrible idea to have only 1 photo per page? It gives a 5 second delay between seeing each one? Nuts to that. Won't be coming back. Bad idea, fellas. Bad idea.
Kim McDougall:
July 2, 2012 at 10:41 am
to all those who hate the new format, I do to but all u need to do is push the across arrow and the page goes to the next picture.
Mary Guerinot:
July 2, 2012 at 12:38 pm
Apparently you think you're the only one smart enough to get this, but let me tell you you're not! Even with this so-called wonderful arrow, it's still a bad format and I don't care for it at all. I think we should go back to the old format - if it's not broke don't fix it!
Chris Snead:
July 4, 2012 at 10:26 pm
i think maybe she was just trying to help those that didn't know how to do that...
July 4, 2012 at 10:35 pm
I was. Thank you Chris
Nelz Khalifa:
July 2, 2012 at 11:47 pm
at first I ddnt see what the big deal was, but all this clicking is making me sleepy. and I used this website to actually stay up at work. fail.
Riordan Taylor:
July 8, 2012 at 3:31 pm
Where can I find one of these sheep?
George Woodard:
July 12, 2012 at 9:03 pm
Thing is, anyone with any computer used to be able to visit this site. Now with the graphics that have to load, a lot of people with slower computers or internet have trouble viewing the website. Not to say it's the end of the world if people can't look at DYAC, but it's not the smartest move for a company that caters to customers.
July 12, 2012 at 9:04 pm
Also, they don't have a mobile version of the website (at least for android) so the website works fine on my relatively new Android phone but I'm sure people with older phones would have more trouble with this site than the old format.
Charles Payne:
September 9, 2012 at 12:37 pm
To everyone who complains about the format: be creative! There's an app. So they don't NEED a mobile site.
"Best of" Lists