Submitted by Chris
Share More
Tags
Vladimir Todorov:
June 25, 2012 at 11:38 pm
What exactly was wrong with the original format? If it ain't broke etc etc.
Ashley Baker:
June 25, 2012 at 11:41 pm
wtf, why is there only one post? This "re-design" sucks.
Kami O'Neil Schultz:
June 25, 2012 at 11:52 pm
Hate the new format--one funny per page? If I wanted social commentary I know my way to facebook....
Mathew Wilson:
June 26, 2012 at 12:15 am
guess what? they changed the format, get the fuck over it.
Christina Butler:
June 26, 2012 at 12:29 am
Really hate the new format. I don't think I'll be visiting anymore. One item per page is just tiresome.
Greg Mallin:
June 26, 2012 at 1:10 am
My like has been deleted. One post per page? Ridiculous. Way to increase the strain on your bandwidth! Remodel fail.
Kelly Legault:
June 26, 2012 at 1:17 am
Really DO NOT like this new format! PLEASE go back to the old one!
Les Baxter:
June 26, 2012 at 3:52 am
Quit coming to the site and complaining, either read or shut up
Stephen Fewell:
June 26, 2012 at 9:01 am
Surely this has to be a fake - I fail to see how those 2 words are remotely alike!
Boba Dryuma:
June 27, 2012 at 11:46 am
Даже меня бесит... фу... очень неудобно... так что я присоединяюсь к предыдущим ораторам... новый формат - ацтой!
Mike Oram:
June 27, 2012 at 12:10 pm
the reason its changed to 1 post per page is so that the site has higher page impressions (the amount of pages that people view). the higher the page impressions the more money you get from the ads >>>>. not a valid reason in my book, 3 or 4 per page would be more realistic! or to not refresh the page per image just refresh the image and maybe the ads....whoever develops dyac needs to take a look at sites like totalfilm (which I develop).
Nicole Figard:
June 30, 2012 at 3:05 am
Complain to the website, not on the comments. It's kind of annoying.
Marcia S. Morton:
July 4, 2012 at 2:05 pm
I like this format!
"Best of" Lists