Submitted by Rachel
Share More
Tags
William Alexander Carter:
June 10, 2012 at 1:38 am
Man, fuck this website. This one-at-a-time shit is annoying the fuck out of me and every goddamn body else.
James Schwarz:
June 10, 2012 at 5:17 am
ok, then don't come here...problem solved
June 10, 2012 at 12:41 pm
i shall not
Sela NotPope Francis:
June 10, 2012 at 1:55 am
Damn you , damnyouautocorrect. Did you get a reverse usability consultant, or is this bizarro world?
Allan VanderSpek:
June 10, 2012 at 2:18 am
The lady who runs this, tends to IGNORE people she doesn't agree with. I've sent 2 emails asking why she changed it, and she's ignored both. Last night, I included images of people complaining about the 1 post/page and she ignored it.
Don't bother trying to get her to answer - she cares only about herself.
June 10, 2012 at 3:00 am
BTW ... the reason she's done this, is she gets money for each impression that the ads make. There are 4 or 5 on her page. Get AdBlockPlus for Chrome or Firefox, and cut into her bottom line. (BUT DO NOT do it for ThreeRingBlog as they are smart, and haven't switched to a money grabbing design.)
June 10, 2012 at 3:08 am
ThreeRingBlogs.com and SpartzNetwork http://www.spartzmedia.com/our-brands is a good place to get similar blogs, but are multi-posts per page. I know TRB isn't planning a change, and I"m pretty sure Spartz isn't either.
Roger Fin:
June 10, 2012 at 10:01 am
That's probably right. So what? If you haven't learned to overlook ads by now, you're lame!
Fiona Reid Cosgrove:
June 14, 2012 at 11:08 am
Roger Fin - overlooking ads isn't the point. It's the fact that this single-page format means you have to load pages over and over again and can't go back to the older autocorrects without loading 9000 ones in between. All so she could have more advertising space.
Lila Smith:
June 10, 2012 at 2:21 am
why one at a time?
Mindy Abraham:
June 10, 2012 at 2:32 am
DOWN WITH NEW FORMAT!
Jamie Kline:
June 10, 2012 at 2:39 am
Why are there so many whiners on here?? It's not the end of the world. You can only read one at a time anyway, so when you finish one, hit the button to go to the next one. I could see getting upset if you were paying to read the content, but it's free.
Tallulah Robinson:
June 10, 2012 at 11:03 am
It's okay if you've got super fast internet (even then still irritating) but most people go to this site on their phone, so changing each time for a new one instead of just scrolling is a complete bitch.
June 14, 2012 at 11:06 am
Also, there's no way to go back to really old autocorrects anymore, unless you want to load about 5000 pages...
Brian Woloshin:
This site now totally sucks! I will not longer support it, and thanks to Firefox and AdBlockPlus I will NOT support any advertisers on this page. This site has now officially gone to shit.
Skyler Bradford Leisha:
June 10, 2012 at 3:16 am
yeah....this was one of my favorite LOL websites....emphasis on WAS.....so long DYAC....it USED to be fun. It used to be a great website.....no more....too bad....so sad..........buh bye....
Susan Borowski:
June 10, 2012 at 3:40 am
Uh what???? Don't see the problem from your post...what up?
June 10, 2012 at 4:07 am
They changed the format of the websites. It used to be 10-15 posts per page with little advertising. Now it's ONE post per page and tons of ads on side, etc. Just just annoying (to ALOT of the viewers according to the comments sections....)
Oden Kun:
June 10, 2012 at 3:27 am
I just read this entire comment thread, waiting for the punchline, then I realized that it's a real comment thread.
Mike Wagner:
June 10, 2012 at 3:29 am
checked back... its still a fail fest..... will not be supporting this site anymore.
Nick Juhacz:
June 10, 2012 at 4:11 am
I don't come here to read the posts anymore, just to see if the site owner smartened up yet. @Jamie Kline, yes you can only read 1 at a time anyway, but even coming here everyday takes a chunk of time to catch up and now having to wait for a page to load between every single message is seriously time consuming. No, we aren't paying for it, but we don't pay for network tv either but drawing in viewers is their money. If nobody sticks around to read this site, who's going to see the ads?
Amy Malloy Whitcomb:
June 10, 2012 at 4:47 am
Mmm, buh-bye. Too many ads, too much time wasted waiting for each DYAC to appear.
Dani McMann:
June 10, 2012 at 4:51 am
Better go back to the old format, or you'll lose a lot of readers......which, by the way, I thought was the point! Damn You auto Correct!
Amy Torres:
June 10, 2012 at 4:52 am
Love this. Especially when I am bored at work and have nothing to do. Makes my time go by faster. lol I try really hard not to laugh too loud but, it doesn't always work. ugh
Cristian Lopez:
June 10, 2012 at 4:58 am
I kept reading this thread waiting for the joke, then I got to a guy that was doing the same thing and later realized it's an actual comment thread.....
Jacob Cox:
June 10, 2012 at 6:05 am
I just spent so much god damn time reading this fucking list of comments before realizing it's an actual thread of people complaining about DYAC and their new format (first time back here in a while)... what the hell why is it not several per page? made browsing them so much easier and no one cares about what you have to say about the DYAC bit, just the DYAC itself. I doubt I come back here unless they change the format back.
Kevin Christopher Foster:
June 10, 2012 at 6:58 am
Yup, came back to check this site out and seen one-at-a-time format which is too much of a pain, like James Schwarz says, I won't come here anymore, problem solved.
LeeAnne Averyheart:
June 10, 2012 at 8:31 am
I'm going to have to agree with everyone else. This format is annoying and pointless.
Bekah Witt:
June 10, 2012 at 10:19 am
Well onto the iPod app....
Melanie 'Jenkins' Coughlin:
June 16, 2012 at 12:20 am
I prefer the new format. On the old one I couldn't always get fresh posts to come up properly.
"Best of" Lists
